By: Jacqueline NUILA
Asset-Based community development is a theory stemming from the ideas of Aaron Antonovsky. Introduced in 1987, his ideas evolved to create the concept of Salutogenesis and included the philosophies of asset-based community development and assets in health. His ideas widely differ from the most commonly used ways of assessing behaviors and health in a given setting. Rather than focusing on the deficiencies and the needs that the community in question, Antonovsky believed that we should focus on what the community does have- the positive attributes, the people, places, organizations, infrastructure, and culture that do and can create healthy environments for those that live in the community. Assets for health are any factor that can better the ability of persons or groups to maintain and conserve health and wellbeing. (1)
Asset-Based community development is a theory stemming from the ideas of Aaron Antonovsky. Introduced in 1987, his ideas evolved to create the concept of Salutogenesis and included the philosophies of asset-based community development and assets in health. His ideas widely differ from the most commonly used ways of assessing behaviors and health in a given setting. Rather than focusing on the deficiencies and the needs that the community in question, Antonovsky believed that we should focus on what the community does have- the positive attributes, the people, places, organizations, infrastructure, and culture that do and can create healthy environments for those that live in the community. Assets for health are any factor that can better the ability of persons or groups to maintain and conserve health and wellbeing. (1)
While reading about Antonovsky’s pioneer
vision, I began to think of the context in which this type of idea would work
best. My immediate reaction was that this model is quite utopic. The idea that
we can sit at a round table and focus on everyone’s talents and ignore the
needs and (at times) the grim realities of the current situation of a certain
community is to me a bit unreal. I realize that perhaps a new way to assess the
needs and situation of a population is needed however it seems to me that it
needs to be a bit more realistic. A balance of both focusing on the good and
bad would be more appropriate. I began
to think of how much the model wouldn’t work in places where there is
civil/political unrest, outright war, ethnic/religious tensions, overwhelming
inequalities, etc.
It did however occur
to me that perhaps we can use this model in a context that is a little closer
to home. "Last Chance High" is a documentary about an alternative
school for at-risk youth in Chicago. Most of the students at Montefiore have
been kicked out of other schools for aggressive behavior, and many have been
diagnosed with emotional disorders. The 8 part documentary series goes much
deeper than simply following the classrooms at Montefiore. It goes into the
homes of students who are one mistake away from being sent to jail or committed
to a mental hospital.
Seeing the problems that these kids were
going through and with the ideas of assets for health floating around in my
head, I saw that this would be an appropriate if not ideal place to use the
model. Most of these kids have been
emotionally neglected, physically or sexually abused and due to these abuses
now have serious anger issues that have gotten them into trouble. Their
problems are all unique however there are obvious threads that the stories have
in common- unstable and almost entirely 1 parent homes, abuse, reside in areas
of violence/gang affiliation, and low socioeconomic status.
If in these schools, we are able to end the
focus on low achievement, teen pregnancy, violence and change the focus to the
opportunities and abilities that these young people do have perhaps we can end the self-fulfilling prophecy we have had
until now. It makes sense that when we only focus and emphasize the
deficiencies and low points that are occurring, there is not much hope given to
those that are born into that situation. If there begins to be a push that
says,” you can achieve, you are creative, you have different gifts and you will
develop new abilities” perhaps it will end the vicious cycle we are seeing in
our school systems today and not only in Chicago. By focusing on instilling
resilience in the children, focusing on the communities as a whole; creating
cohesive communities that rely on each other for support and become interconnected
and positive, we can create a true social change that isn’t only limited to our
schools but our world.
References:
1. Hernan M, Morgan A, Mena A. Formación en salutogénesis y activos para
la salud. Granada: Catalogo Publicidad S.L.; 2010.
Images: http://images.rapgenius.com/9b0d05ac3d177f3d0592fa6d5e0280fe.500x283x1.jpg
http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-muckrakers/files/2012/07/shutterstock_99925400.jpg
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario